Following the stabbing of his wife in the chest, a man from Arbroath was released from jail. This occurred after the guy had committed the crime. In the court process that took place today, the victim of a man who stabbed his wife in the chest after the couple had gone out for the night made an appeal to the judge, requesting that he be spared from conviction and released from jail from his current sentence.
As a direct result of this, the prosecutor was able to avoid serving the time that was required of him in prison. Tony Cartney was granted a community payback order that forced him to perform 300 hours of unpaid labor and was placed under monitoring for a period of three years throughout the duration of the order.
In addition, the order compelled him to report to the court periodically. Given the circumstances, the judge stated that he felt the case to be extraordinary; hence, he concluded that a disposition that did not involve jail might be rendered due to the unusual nature of the situation. In light of the fact that the decision would make it possible for her to be reunited with her husband, Leigh Cartney, who is married to Cartney, emerged from the High Court in Edinburgh with a smile on her face and a sense of relief. Cartney is the spouse of Leigh Cartney. The judge, Lord Boyd of Duncansby, informed Cartney, who is 49 years old, that “so far as punishment is concerned, you will have to live with the fact that you caused a very serious injury to the person you love.” Cartney was told this by the judge. It was the judge who conveyed this information to Cartney.
What Lord Boyd believed would be something that would stay with Cartney for the rest of his life was something that he believed would be something that would remain with him. Cartney was a first-time offender with a solid job record, that he was truly sorry for his actions, and that he did not constitute a threat to the general public, according to him. He said that he took into consideration a variety of variables, including the fact that he was really sorry for his actions. In response, the court made the following statement: “I am also satisfied that if I were to impose a sentence of imprisonment, it would have a detrimental effect on your wife and she would be subjected to the same amount of punishment as you would be.”
He shared with Cartney the information that “In a normal situation, there would be no doubt that you would be subject to incarceration for a considerable amount of time.” Cartney was aware of this information. In view of the gravity of the offense, it is impossible to minimize the harshness of the punishment that will be imposed. There is a possibility that the fact that you are not being charged with murder is more of a result of luck and good fortune than it is of anything else. A victim impact statement and a letter from Mrs. Cartney were both delivered to Lord Boyd, who mentioned in his address that he had received both of these documents. The two of them were both directed toward him. In addition to this, he stated that it was evident that she desired for the relationship that she had with her husband to be maintained.
Cartney received the following message from him in his correspondence with her: “She makes it abundantly clear that she does not want you to go to prison, and she describes the negative impact that such an outcome would have on her.” A point was brought to the judge’s attention that, despite the fact that she was aware that victims required protection, no one had bothered to question about her desires or what she considered to be in her best interests. This was despite the fact that she was aware that victims required protection. Despite the fact that she was aware that victims desired protection, she continued to act in this manner.
The forced separation that took place between the two individuals during the course of the previous year, during which she was legally barred from meeting Cartney as a consequence of a court order, which he referred to as “an unhappy and stressful time for her”—the separation that took place between them. “She describes it as a bereavement,” the judge remarked, providing further light on the circumstances that were at play.
You and your wife have been married for close to twenty-five years, and you have a son who is now an adult. Your relationship has been the source of your happiness and fulfillment.
The members of your family do not have a history of physically abusing one another within the confines of the home. When he made a remark on the circumstance, he made the observation that this, on the other hand, is characterized as being completely out of character.
The ideas that Mrs. Cartney had expressed were seen as “genuine and freely held” by Lord Boyd, who claimed that what he had witnessed and heard from Mrs. Cartney demonstrated that these characteristics were there during the entirety of the circumstance. In conclusion, he stated, “There is no suggestion that your wife is a victim of domestic abuse or that she is under any emotional or other pressure.
He was referring to the fact that she was not put under any pressure. Not only did the judge mention in his remarks that he needed to take into account the wife’s sentiments, but he also mentioned that he needed to take into account the wider public interest. He made this statement on a number of occasions. However, before he could give down a prison sentence, he wanted to make sure that there was no other manner of disposal that was suitable.
He wanted to make sure that there was no other option appropriate. A statement released by Kris Gilmartin, a defense attorney and supporter of Leigh Cartney, suggested that Tony Cartney’s crimes have been forgiven by Leigh Cartney’s family, and that Leigh Cartney herself has also forgiven Tony Cartney for his conduct.
